Governed Autonomy — Relationship

Direct answer

Governed Autonomy — Relationship is implemented as a source-bounded relationship guide.

Answer contract

Apply the relationship lens only to the exact inspected source scope; do not infer authority from adjacent topics.

Evidence and exact locators

maha-principle — repo:content/books/the-maha-principle/The-Maha-Principle.md — working authorial manuscript inspected 2026-09-05; Device Autonomy assessment; bodily-autonomy bridge; authorial framing. Supports: The author’s normative concept of autonomy under technological and institutional pressure.

orbital-mind — repo:content/books/the-orbital-mind/the-orbital-mind.md — working authorial manuscript inspected 2026-09-05; Mars · Agency and Boundary; Limits and Alternatives. Supports: Agency as mobilization constrained by boundaries and explicit failure modes.

What the evidence does not establish

This is an authorial thesis and assessment framework, not a validated clinical scale or settled political doctrine.

Planetary and mythic material is symbolic imagery, not empirical evidence.

Rights and reuse

Maha-controlled authorial manuscript; record section identity and file digest only. Any later quotation remains subject to the author-controlled publication policy.

Dependencies and related concepts

applies-to: urn:maha:concept:autonomy:governed-autonomy

governed-by: urn:maha:concept:governance

evidence-for: urn:maha:concept:autonomy

Authority and locator

This authority and locator section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The author’s normative concept of autonomy under technological and institutional pressure. Agency as mobilization constrained by boundaries and explicit failure modes.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: This is an authorial thesis and assessment framework, not a validated clinical scale or settled political doctrine. Planetary and mythic material is symbolic imagery, not empirical evidence.

Context or method

This context or method section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The author’s normative concept of autonomy under technological and institutional pressure. Agency as mobilization constrained by boundaries and explicit failure modes.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: This is an authorial thesis and assessment framework, not a validated clinical scale or settled political doctrine. Planetary and mythic material is symbolic imagery, not empirical evidence.

Limits and uncertainty

This limits and uncertainty section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The author’s normative concept of autonomy under technological and institutional pressure. Agency as mobilization constrained by boundaries and explicit failure modes.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: This is an authorial thesis and assessment framework, not a validated clinical scale or settled political doctrine. Planetary and mythic material is symbolic imagery, not empirical evidence.

Dependencies

This dependencies section is constrained to the same inspected scope: The author’s normative concept of autonomy under technological and institutional pressure. Agency as mobilization constrained by boundaries and explicit failure modes.

It must preserve the recorded boundary: This is an authorial thesis and assessment framework, not a validated clinical scale or settled political doctrine. Planetary and mythic material is symbolic imagery, not empirical evidence.

Questions this page can answer